Tag Archives: constitution party

Property Rights

Now is a season of confusing political interests and ideas. People want this special interest or that special interest, or one candidate has a different view and opinion than another candidate; all because of what maybe promised if a certain candidate is elected. What is a voter to do, especially during this season of confusing politics?

To make the best and educated decisions we only have to return to the basics! Those basic principles include God’s laws and the U.S. Constitution, which He gave to mankind to govern ourselves. The Constitution wasn’t anything really new, but was a continuance of the Mosaic Law, that God gave to the children of Israel, in order to govern themselves after leaving Egypt. Within these Sacred Laws we find such commandments as: “Thou shalt not steal. Thou shalt not covet they neighbor’s house, thou shalt not covet they neighbor’s wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor anything that is they neighbor’s.” Both of these commandments deal with the right to be safe within one’s own property, safety to worship how one pleases, makes money as they please (intellectual property or ideas) as well as their physical property and money; the right to defend that property and all lives within that property.

We read in James Madison’s (the “Father of the Constitution”) National Gazette article (dated March 29, 1792) where he boldly declares that ideas, money, religious beliefs, as well as one’s physical property need to be protected at all costs; that this was government’s sole purpose. Then we read John Adam’s (one of the authors of the Declaration of Independence) 1787 writings to learn what is at stake at not protecting property rights.

          “Suppose a nation, rich and poor, high and low, ten millions in number, all assembled together; not more than one or two millions will have lands, houses, or any personal property; if we take into the account the women and children, or even if we leave them out of the question, a great majority of every nation is wholly destitute of property, except a small quantity of clothes, and a few trifles of other moveables. Would Mr. Nedham be responsible that, if all were to be decided by a vote of the majority, the eight or nine millions who have no property, would not think of usurping over the rights of the one or two millions who have? Property is surely a right of man- kind as real as liberty. Perhaps, at first, prejudice, habit, shame or fear, principle or religion, would restrain the poor from attacking the rich, and the idle from usurping on the industrious; but the time would not be long before courage and enterprise would come, and pretexts be invented by degrees, to countenance the majority in dividing all the property among them, or at least, in sharing it equally with its present possessors. Debts would be abolished first; taxes laid heavy on the rich, and not at all on the others; and at last a downright equal division of everything be demanded, and voted. What would be the consequence of this? The idle, the vicious, the intemperate, would rush into the utmost extravagance of debauchery, sell and spend all their share, and then demand a new division of those who purchased from them. The moment the idea is admitted into society, that property is not as sacred as the laws of God, and that there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence. If ‘Thou shalt not covet,’ and ‘Thou shalt not steal,’ were not commandments of Heaven, they must be made inviolable precepts in every society, before it can be civilized or made free.”

Now let us look at the law of the land, the U.S. Constitution (Article 6 Section 2) and the first ten amendments (the Bill of Rights).  The first amendment protects our free speech, association and freedom of conscience (religious liberty).  The second amendment protects all of our prop-erty rights, either against criminals, invaders from other lands, or even our own government.  It is our right to defend our property with whatever we see fit.  The third amendment prohibits the government at any level from quartering their troops (or government agents) within our property.  The fourth amendment prohibits government from seizing our property, and further declares that we must be safe within our property:

“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

The Fifth Amendment deals with several aspects but only one effects property rights, the concept of eminent domain. This specifically addresses and even forces any level of govern-ment to pay ‘fair compensation for property’ that they need to purchase for necessary projects.  It is NOT a pass for government to seize and pay whatever they deem as ‘just’ for that property (that is proper ‘eminent domain’).  The property owner is at all times in control of the sale of his property, or should be.  This amendment guarantees this right.  (It also mentions grand juries, self incrimination, due process [as does the sixth amendment] and double jeopardy, too; but they don’t really deal with property, which is the subject of this paper.)

The seventh and eighth amendments protect our ideas and our money; ideas/money may be protected via a civil law suit, and they address a prohibition against excessive fees and punishments.

Why I am running for House District 64

The reason as to why I am running is out of concern for my country and my country men, and the direction that our nation is heading. I was also concerned at the direction that Utah is heading as well. I thought to myself what was one to do? Well the answer was and still is that we must cleanse the inner vessel if we were ever to save the Republic. After all, to preserve the nation first and foremost starts with the individual, then the local communities, then the States, and lastly the Nation. Like John Adams stated concerning our sacred US Constitution.

“Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”

If we look at the State legislature for example, they are a pretty poor example of what a Constitutionally limited government is supposed to look like. In fact I’d argue that our State is quickly moving towards California, in regards to political ideology. With an average of 600 new laws being passed per year, with the proposals of California styled same gender laws, and proposed six million dollar tax incentives being offered to the NSA. My wish is to unite upon common ground and repeal any law that is in conflict with the State and Federal constitutions. To reduce taxation and to balance our own books with in this wonderful sovereign State of Utah. I could speak as to many other issues and or threats with in this State, whether it be Common Core, expansion of Medicaid part D, or any other issue that the Feds are forcing upon our free will at this current time. Which may I add; I am opposed too and have a plan for each important issue. The issues that I would like to speak to you about today is the issues of calling for a modern day constitutional convention and Nullification.

The resolution to call for one ambiguous constitutional convention call, has started right here in Utah since 2010 by representatives Ken Ivory, former representative Brad Daw, current State Senator Wayne Niederhauser, Speaker of the House Becky Lockhart, Governor Gary Herbert and others. All of which are republicans and are a part of the republican establishment in our State. All have been strong arming behind closed doors other elected representatives and senators for this Con Con (Constitutional Convention) agenda. This last year they even blocked and censored public comment on this very subject. Since 2010 they have blocked all attempts to nullify unconstitutional federal laws, such as Obamacare (ACA), and future and past unconstitutional anti-gun laws which are in conflict with the 2nd Amendment, etc. Please see both of my articles on the Con Con and the principle of Nullification on my campaign website at jasonthepatriot.com.

It was, thanks to God the almighty, that we preserved that last thread of the Constitution instead of severing it, with the stopping of the Con Con call (for now). My question to you is Why would the republican establishment work to block nullification on any future anti-gun bills last year? Why would the republican establishment block the nullification of Obamacare last year? Why would they want the feds to dictate to this Great Sovereign State of Utah what is NOT in Utah’s best interest? Why would the republican establishment work repetitively to call for one ambiguous constitutional convention call, while calling it by another name (Article V Convention)? What is their agenda? In this race for the House District 64, before I sought for the council with the Lord, I noticed that we didn’t have a good republican choice that would have a back bone to stand up to the republican establishment in this State, and the feds. The question is why? We need Independent voices on the floor of the State House. We need Honesty and Transparency. We need Traditional Moral Values.

Therefore: I commit to the unraveling of the insidious Common Core standards! I commit to showing a back bone to the Feds and our State leadership! I commit to promote a policy of nullifying unconstitutional, and therefore unlawful Federal laws and acts. I will continue to work tirelessly against any call for a constitutional convention, as well as encourage other States to rescind their calls! I commit to Stand in Defense of all individual God ordained rights, such as the right to defend ones self, property, persons and family! As well as ones right to own and control their own property! I commit to exposing corruption from within! I commit to Stand with our duly elected County Sheriffs in their efforts to stand by and defend our constitutionally recognized God ordained sacred rights! I commit to a policy of repealing any law in conflict with our State and Federal Constitutions! I commit to a policy of voting “Nay” to any law that flies in the face of our State and Federal Constitutions! I commit to being Honest and forthright! I commit to having a clear channel for those that I would represent in contacting me and voicing their concerns and opinions. In closing lets heed to the wise counsel given by the illustrious George Washington (father of these States united) given Nov. 19th 1794.

“Let us unite, therefore, in imploring the Supreme Ruler of nations, to spread his holy protection over these United States; to turn the machinations of the wicked to the confirming of our constitution; to enable us at all times to root out internal sedition, and put invasion to flight; to perpetuate to our country that prosperity, which his goodness has already conferred, and to verify the anticipation of this government being a safeguard to human rights.”
I ask for your Prayers, your Support, your Help, and your vote. Please feel free and visit my website at jasonthepatriot.com. As well as my facebook page at facebook.com/jasonchristensenforhouse and or even call me anytime day or night at 801-400-1488. Thank you for your time and support.

Sincerely, Jason Christensen